Gurugram registrar tells Mahindra Aura RWA to apply conveyance deeds to EWS park access

What the registrar has now directed

The District Registrar of Firms and Societies in Gurugram has issued a memorandum, dated October 3, 2026, to the Residents' Welfare Association of Mahindra Aura. The RWA must proceed strictly under the registered conveyance deed and the approved bye-laws. The memorandum also states that rights, usage limits and other matters concerning common parks and green spaces will be governed by those documents.

The order does not itself settle whether EWS residents can use the central park. It moves that question to the society's legal papers, which the RWA has said give EWS residents different rights.

How the dispute developed

The dispute started with a complaint from Kashmir Singh, an EWS resident, who approached the authorities on August 31, 2026. In an order dated September 15, the District Registrar directed the RWA, its office-bearers and its security staff not to stop Singh, his wife and other EWS residents from using internal roads, pathways and the society park.

• August 31, 2026: complaint filed by an EWS resident.
• September 15, 2026: registrar orders the RWA to stop restricting EWS residents' use of common roads, pathways and the park.
• September 28, 2026: RWA files a representation arguing that EWS allottees' conveyance deeds and allotment letters exclude the central park and other facilities inside the main complex.
• October 3, 2026: registrar issues the memorandum referring the matter back to the society's registered documents.

The RWA's position

According to the trade report, the RWA's case is that EWS allottees hold their rights under separate property documents, and that those documents provide for different rights and maintenance arrangements from those of residents in the main complex. The registrar's memorandum does not record a finding on that argument. It sends the question back to the documents.

What it changes for buyers and owners

For EWS owners at Mahindra Aura, the practical question is now which clauses in their own conveyance deed and allotment letter apply. For buyers of mixed-category projects, the case shows that common-area rights can depend on separate documents for each category of unit, not only on the layout of the site.

For investors, the case points to a legal risk in projects where affordable units share a campus with market-rate towers: access disputes can end up before the registrar and depend on drafting in the deeds.

What happens next

No further order, appeal or RWA response on the October 3 memorandum was found in the sources reviewed for this report. Whether the park access question is decided in favour of the RWA or the EWS residents will depend on how the registrar reads the conveyance deeds and bye-laws. Readers should check the registrar's office for any later orders.