Legal and RERA
Haryana RERA rejects Tata Primanti buyers' claims after conveyance deed
The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA) at Gurugram dismissed a complaint by two buyers of Tata Primanti in Sector 72, who had sought delay-possession charges, refunds and payments linked to amenities and alleged defects. The authority held that the buyers had signed the conveyance deed without recording objections or reserving their claims, which weakened their later monetary demands.

| Forum | Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA), Gurugram |
|---|---|
| Complainants | Chanchal Batra and Neeraj Batra |
| Respondent | Tata Housing Development Company |
| Project and location | Tata Primanti, Sector 72, Gurugram (Southern Peripheral Road, Sohna Road side) |
| Claims sought | Delay-possession charges, refunds, and payments relating to amenities and alleged defects |
| Ruling basis as reported | Execution of the conveyance deed without raising objections or reserving claims |
| Amounts claimed or awarded | Not stated in the reporting found |
| Order date | Reporting is dated October 2026 (story date 8 October 2026 per editor brief; PropNewsTime page last updated 10 October 2026) |
| Appeal or next step | None reported as of October 2026 |
What happened
HRERA Gurugram dismissed a complaint filed by Chanchal Batra and Neeraj Batra against Tata Housing Development Company over their apartments in the Tata Primanti project in Sector 72, Gurugram. The reporting covered in October 2026 describes the ruling as rejecting the buyers' subsequent monetary demands.
The buyers had sought delay-possession charges, refunds, and payments relating to amenities and alleged defects. Reporting did not state the amounts claimed or any amount awarded.
The ruling and its reasoning
According to the reporting, the authority held that the buyers executed the conveyance deed without raising objections or reserving their claims. The authority treated this as weighing against the buyers' later monetary demands.
A conveyance deed is a legal document that transfers ownership of a property from the developer to the buyer. Once a buyer signs it without reservation, the buyer's ability to pursue certain claims afterward can be affected, according to the ruling as reported.
The reporting we reviewed names no HRERA members and quotes no one from the authority, the developer or the complainants.
Project background (unverified details flagged)
Tata Primanti is in Sector 72, Gurugram, on the Southern Peripheral Road with access to Sohna Road and NH-48, according to the developer's project page. Tata Housing lists HRERA Registration No. 98 of 2017 for the project on its official site.
Other figures in listing portals conflict and are not confirmed here: unit counts (reported variously as around 1,100 homes and 1,105 units), site area (36 acres in one listing), configurations and sizes, prices, and launch and completion dates (reported as 2010, 2011 and 2018 in different sources). A different RERA number appearing on one listing portal conflicts with the official registration and is not used. No price is published in this article because no authoritative figure was confirmed.
Other HRERA positions on conveyance deeds
The Batra ruling is not the only recent word from HRERA on conveyance deeds, and the positions in the reporting are not uniform.
- In a separate Tata Primanti complaint (complaint no. 126 of 2019), a buyer sought refund of a booking amount for a unit under an agreement dated 07.01.2016. That is a different case and is not merged with the Batra complaint.
- In complaint 4062 of 2020, against a different Tata Housing project, the order states: The right of the allottee to claim delayed possession charges shall not be abrogated simply for the said reason.
- In complaint 6260 of 2022, the order is reported to say that the conveyance deed does not end the promoter's liabilities and obligations towards the unit. The date and developer were not shown in the excerpt reviewed.
- On 10 September 2026, in a Sector 37C commercial shop matter involving Apex Build-well, HRERA reportedly ruled for a buyer whose transfer was held up by the developer's delay in executing the conveyance deed.
In an appeal-stage Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) decision in an Emaar case, the tribunal reportedly held that homebuyers do not lose the right to seek compensation for delayed possession after executing conveyance deeds.
Regulatory guideline on conveyance timing
Haryana RERA guidelines, as cited in the reporting, require a promoter to execute the registered conveyance deed within three months of the occupation certificate or when 60% of purchasers in the building or wing have paid the full consideration, whichever is earlier. The Batra ruling is reported to turn on what the buyers did after signing, not on the timing of the deed.
What it means for buyers, developers and the market
For buyers: Any claim that is still open when a conveyance deed is signed should be written into the relevant documents. Relying on pursuing it later may not be enough, according to the reasoning reported in this ruling.
For developers: The decision puts weight on the conveyance process and on the documents that accompany the transfer of ownership.
Limits of the ruling: The reporting describes the order as tied to the specific facts of the Tata Primanti dispute. It should not be read as a general rule for all Gurugram conveyance deeds, and the contrary HRERA and REAT positions above show the question is not settled across cases.
Market impact: No market data or price effect linked to this ruling was found.
What is not known yet
- The order number, bench, and full text of the Batra order were not found.
- The developer's response was not found.
- No appeal, hearing date or follow-up step was reported as of October 2026.
- The amounts claimed and any amount awarded were not reported.
Frequently asked questions
What did HRERA decide in the Tata Primanti case?
HRERA Gurugram dismissed a complaint by Chanchal Batra and Neeraj Batra against Tata Housing Development Company. The buyers had sought delay-possession charges, refunds and payments linked to amenities and alleged defects. The authority held that signing the conveyance deed without objections or reserved claims weighed against those later monetary demands.
What is a conveyance deed?
A conveyance deed is a legal document that transfers ownership of a property from the developer to the buyer.
Did the buyers receive any money?
The reporting reviewed does not say that any money was awarded. The buyers' claims were dismissed, and the amounts involved were not stated.
Does this ruling apply to every Gurugram buyer?
The reporting describes the order as fact-specific to the Tata Primanti dispute. HRERA and REAT decisions in other cases have taken different positions on whether signing a conveyance deed ends a buyer's claims, so the ruling should not be treated as a general rule.
Can the Batra order be appealed?
No appeal before the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal was reported for this order as of October 2026.
Has Tata Housing responded to the ruling?
No developer response was found in the reporting reviewed.