Consumer Complaint
Discovery Park allottees seek HRERA action on BPTP's SkyNest registration
Allottees of BPTP's Discovery Park in Sector 80, Faridabad, have asked the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA), Panchkula, to cancel or suspend the separate SkyNest Towers registration, stop further bookings and construction, and take penal action. The Authority has issued notice to BPTP and has not passed a final order as of 20 October 2026.

| Complainants | Allottees of Discovery Park, Sector 80, Faridabad |
|---|---|
| Respondent | BPTP Limited |
| HRERA listing | Representation-cum-complaint, Item No. 327.37, considered at the meeting of 29 July 2026 |
| Original licence | Licence No. 44 of 2008, granted 6 March 2008, covering 16.331 acres |
| Discovery Park registration | HRERA Registration No. 297 of 2017, dated 16 October 2017 |
| SkyNest registration | HRERA-PKL-FBD-881-2026, dated 9 April 2026, valid to 31 March 2033 |
| Company sales claim (9 October 2026) | 150 of 325 apartments sold, about ₹750 crore, per BPTP |
| Hearings adjourned | 9 September, 16 September and 14 October 2026; no substantive order reported for 14 October |
What the complainants want
The representation-cum-complaint was recorded by HRERA Panchkula on 29 July 2026. The complainants ask the Authority to:
- cancel or suspend the SkyNest Towers registration;
- stay further bookings and construction;
- nullify the revised building plans and require adherence to the original layout;
- take penal action against the promoter.
The Authority has issued notice to BPTP and asked for a reply. No final order, penalty or stay has been reported.
The land and plan allegations
The complainants say the land used for SkyNest is part of the larger area originally licensed for Discovery Park. According to the representation, the original licence covered 16.331 acres for a group housing colony. They say Discovery Park was later registered over about 10.74 acres and SkyNest over about 5.9 acres.
The complaint uses different figures for the later project area. One passage refers to 5.931 acres and another to a revised plan over approximately 5.391 acres.
The complainants also allege that revised building plans dated 5 March 2026 were obtained without the consent of two-thirds of the existing allottees, which they say the RERA Act and a DTCP public notice of 18 July 2022 require. They cite Section 14 of the RERA Act.
According to the complainants, the original plans approved on 27 June 2012 covered the full 16.331 acres with 12 main residential towers of 15 floors each, two EWS towers, a nursery school, a primary school, a shopping complex and a clubhouse. They say nine main residential towers and two EWS towers have been built, and the promised schools remain outstanding.
They further allege that Discovery Park was sold between 2012 and 2015 on the basis of the full integrated layout, and that the bifurcation was not disclosed in the original RERA application. These are allegations by the complainants. HRERA has not made findings on them.
SkyNest and the sales claim
BPTP announced the launch of SkyNest in April 2026 as a high-rise project in Sector 80, Greater Faridabad, with an estimated gross development value of ₹1,800 crore. The project comprises twin towers of about 150 metres with 325 units in 3 BHK and 4 BHK configurations. Unit sizes range from 3,185 sq ft to 3,856 sq ft, with a starting price of ₹4.48 crore.
On 9 October 2026, the company said 150 apartments had been sold, worth about ₹750 crore, with an average ticket size of around ₹5 crore. This is BPTP's own claim. It has not been independently audited. The statement gave the total only and did not break the sales down by configuration, buyer profile or period.
The company's chief executive, Manik Malik, said demand in the Delhi-NCR residential market remained strong. Chief Business Officer Vineet Nanda said the project reflects the company's approach to emerging corridors such as Greater Faridabad. The company has not publicly responded to the specific Discovery Park representation in its October sales announcements.
Where the case stands
As of 20 October 2026, the matter has been adjourned on 9 September, 16 September and 14 October 2026. The HRERA directions record that the complaint was sent to the promoter by email and registered post, and that BPTP must file a reply at least one week before the next hearing. The most recent listing reviewed shows no substantive order on the central allegations for the 14 October hearing. No new hearing date has been reported.
The HRERA record reviewed records procedural directions and adjournments. It does not establish that the allegations have been proved. The materials reviewed also do not show any court conviction of BPTP or of any named individual over these specific allegations.
Separate service complaints at Discovery Park
Separately from the HRERA complaint, residents of Discovery Park have told local media of post-possession problems. They report that individual electricity connections are still absent years after occupation began around 2019, that supply relies on a single point with frequent outages, that maintenance charges are climbing toward ₹9,000 a year, and that there is waterlogging and non-working street lights. These are resident accounts and have not been decided by any authority.
What it means for buyers and the market
For SkyNest buyers, the complaint would affect the registration and new bookings if an order were passed against the project. No order has been passed, so nothing has changed for SkyNest so far. The complaint does not establish fraud.
For Discovery Park allottees, the case concerns sanctioned plans, land division, consent for plan changes, and promised schools and amenities.
The sales claim and the complaint point in different directions. The ₹750 crore figure is the developer's own statement, while the complaint is a pending regulatory matter. Buyers weighing a unit of ₹3 crore or more are advised to check the HRERA status of the project before committing.
What happens next
- HRERA has not announced a new hearing date after the 14 October 2026 adjournment.
- BPTP must file its reply at least one week before the next hearing, under the July 2026 direction.
- The Authority has not yet decided whether to cancel, suspend or stay any registration or booking.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Discovery Park complaint asking HRERA to do?
The allottees ask HRERA Panchkula to cancel or suspend the SkyNest Towers registration, stop further bookings and construction, nullify the revised plans dated 5 March 2026, require adherence to the original layout, and take penal action against the promoter.
Has HRERA ruled on the complaint?
No. As of 20 October 2026, the Authority has issued notice to BPTP and asked for a reply. The hearings on 9 September, 16 September and 14 October 2026 were adjourned, and no final order has been reported.
How many SkyNest apartments has BPTP said it has sold?
On 9 October 2026, BPTP said 150 of the planned 325 apartments had been sold, worth about ₹750 crore. This is the company's own claim and has not been independently audited.
Does the complaint mean SkyNest is unsafe to buy?
The complaint does not establish fraud, and no order has been passed against SkyNest. Buyers can check the project's HRERA status and the status of the pending complaint before booking.
Who are the parties named in the complaint?
The complainants are allottees of Discovery Park in Sector 80, Faridabad. The respondent is BPTP Limited, the Gurugram-based developer.