Realty legal
ED provisionally attaches ₹136.42 crore in Ocean Seven Buildtech case
The Enforcement Directorate said on 14 October 2026 that it had provisionally attached movable and immovable assets worth ₹136.42 crore belonging to Gurugram-based Ocean Seven Buildtech, its promoter Swaraj Singh Yadav and his wife, Sunita Swaraj. The agency alleges the company collected more than ₹118 crore from buyers for four Rajasthan projects without handing over possession; these are allegations, not findings of guilt.

| Latest attachment | ₹136.42 crore, provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) |
|---|---|
| Total attached in the case | Approximately ₹188 crore, according to the ED |
| Alleged collections | More than ₹118 crore from plot buyers for four Rajasthan projects between December 2006 and March 2015 |
| Projects named | Amber Garden in Bilonchi village, Jaipur district; Kot Residency, Kot Farms and Kot Industrial Estate in Kotputli-Behror |
| Latest attachment includes | Land parcels in Bilonchi and Kotputli-Behror, a residential plot in Sector 102, Gurugram, and balances of ₹69.06 lakh in five bank accounts |
| Earlier action | The ED said it provisionally attached assets worth approximately ₹51.57 crore on 5 January 2026 and filed a prosecution complaint on 9 January 2026 |
What the ED says happened
On 14 October 2026, the ED announced a provisional attachment of assets valued at ₹136.42 crore belonging to Ocean Seven Buildtech Private Limited, promoter Swaraj Singh Yadav and his wife, Sunita Swaraj. The agency said the total value of assets attached in the case had reached approximately ₹188 crore.
The investigation concerns alleged collections of more than ₹118 crore from buyers for Amber Garden, Kot Residency, Kot Farms and Kot Industrial Estate in Rajasthan. The ED alleges that buyers were promised development and possession of their allotted plots within three to four years, but did not receive possession.
The ED said collections for Amber Garden began in December 2006, before the company had applied to the Jaipur Development Authority for approval of the project map. According to the agency, inspections by the development authority and revenue officials found the projects undeveloped and the sites substantially vacant. It also alleged that some buyers who had paid in full and received registered conveyance deeds and possession letters still lacked possession or plot demarcation.
Assets and investigation
The latest attachment covers land parcels in Bilonchi village, Jaipur district, and Kotputli-Behror, as well as a residential plot in Sector 102, Gurugram. It also includes balances totalling ₹69.06 lakh in five bank accounts held by the company and the couple.
The ED said the latest action principally relates to two Rajasthan police FIRs: FIR No. 0250, registered at Daulatpura police station in Jaipur (West) on 7 December 2025, and FIR No. 0326, registered at Paniyala police station in Kotputli-Behror on 23 November 2025. The wider investigation was initiated on the basis of FIRs registered by Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing and by Haryana and Rajasthan police. The alleged offences include cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery and criminal conspiracy.
The agency alleges that buyer funds were diverted to purposes unrelated to developing the four projects, including purchasing office premises in Gurugram and making advances towards other projects. It also said that approximately 39 acres owned by the company and its promoters were transferred to close associates or third parties between June and September 2025, after FIRs were registered. Those properties were included in the latest provisional attachment.
The ED had earlier provisionally attached assets worth approximately ₹51.57 crore under an order dated 5 January 2026. It filed a prosecution complaint before the PMLA Special Court at Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, on 9 January 2026.
What it means for buyers and what happens next
The attachment is an enforcement action over assets, not a ruling that the allegations have been proved. For buyers who say they paid for the Rajasthan plots, the ED’s allegations describe a dispute over possession and development; the attachment itself does not establish that buyers will receive plots or refunds.
As of 15 October 2026, the ED said its investigation was continuing and gave no timetable for further action. The case will proceed through the relevant legal process. Ocean Seven Buildtech is also identified in a Haryana RERA filing as the promoter of Gurugram projects including The Venetian and Golf Heights; the records cited do not establish a link between those projects and the Rajasthan allegations.
Frequently asked questions
What assets did the ED attach?
The ED said the provisional attachment covers land parcels in Bilonchi village and Kotputli-Behror, a residential plot in Gurugram’s Sector 102, and ₹69.06 lakh in balances across five bank accounts.
Which projects are involved in the case?
The four projects named by the ED are Amber Garden in Bilonchi village, Jaipur district, and Kot Residency, Kot Farms and Kot Industrial Estate in Kotputli-Behror.
How much money did the ED say was collected from buyers?
The ED alleges that more than ₹118 crore was collected from plot buyers for the four projects between December 2006 and March 2015.
Does the attachment mean the company or its promoter has been found guilty?
No. The attachment is provisional, and the allegations remain allegations. It is not a finding of guilt.
What happens next?
As of 15 October 2026, the ED said its investigation was ongoing. The agency had previously filed a prosecution complaint before the PMLA Special Court at Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.